Re: FW: PLEASE REVIEW: Draft changes to Kudzu Policies/Processes | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: John Burger (jburger![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 06:18:16 -0800 (PST) |
Thanks for the feedback, everyone. What I am hearing is that libraries understand that recalls happen fairly infrequently, can be somewhat troublesome. Generally it is easier/faster/cheaper
to request to borrow a copy of an item from another library if the local copy is loaned out to another library, rather than try to recall it. But recalls are sometimes necessary, especially if an item needs to be placed on reserve. It also sounds like the
draft policy allows libraries to have this kind of leeway when they need it. Do we need to be more explicit about any of these factors regarding recalls? Or is it OK as drafted?
Thanks. --jeb John Burger, Executive Director Association of Southeastern Research Libraries ASERL c/o Georgia State University Library - Administration Suite LS7 100 Decatur Street SE Atlanta, GA 30303-3202 Follow ASERL on Facebook:
http://on.fb.me/Ziuz2a
Find me on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/ASERLJEB
From: Kudzu-Ops [mailto:kudzu-ops-bounces+jburger=aserl.org [at] aserl-lists.org]
On Behalf Of John Burger Hey, Kudzu-ers: Thanks to everyone who reviewed the draft policy changes. Here is the one question I received that may require further thinking / conversation. I welcome feedback from you-all. Hi John, I am happy with the agreement in general, although the one thing that I find a little difficult is the recall issue.
>>Here’s what is in the proposed new policy:
9. All materials lent through this agreement are subject to recall by the lender and should be returned as soon as possible. All recalls and overdue materials will be sent to the lending library via expedited
delivery as soon as possible. The standard method for returning an item to the lending library will be USPS book rate. << It is not that I am unwilling to return a book to the lender, but in some cases I have received recalls for books that we hadn’t even received. When one of our books has been loaned out to another library through
ILL, we tell our patrons to submit an ILL request and we get a copy for them that way rather than sending a recall which would often take longer to get back to us than doing a regular ILL request and cause extra work for the library that borrowed it. Also
it is not always easy to get a book back from a patron in a timely manner despite our best efforts. I understand it is our responsibility to get items back to the lender and I am certainly willing to do that to the best of my ability but I do wonder there could be a little more flexibility such as the lender
seeing if they could get the book from another library in a reasonable time without having to recall their copy.
Of course if it is something that is just not readily available or would take longer to get through ILL then a recall is appropriate -- we respect that, and do our best to expedite the return.
Please let me know your comments & suggestions. Thanks. --jeb John Burger, Executive Director Association of Southeastern Research Libraries ASERL c/o Georgia State University Library - Administration Suite LS7 100 Decatur Street SE Atlanta, GA 30303-3202 Follow ASERL on Facebook:
http://on.fb.me/Ziuz2a
Find me on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/ASERLJEB
From: John Burger
Hey folks: A reminder that comments on these draft changes to the Kudzu ILL policy/process document are due by the end of the week. I’ve gotten comments from Shirley at VCU, plus one or
two affirmations so far. Anyone else? --jeb John Burger, Executive Director Association of Southeastern Research Libraries ASERL c/o Georgia State University Library - Administration Suite LS7 100 Decatur Street SE Atlanta, GA 30303-3202 Follow ASERL on Facebook:
http://on.fb.me/Ziuz2a
Find me on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/ASERLJEB
From: John Burger
Good afternoon, Kudzu-istas: As promised, we have reviewed the longstanding “Guidelines for Expediting Delivery of Information Among Libraries Participating in ASERL’s Kudzu Project.” My thanks to Courtney
Crepeau (U-Kentucky), Tracy Luna (U-Tennessee), and Shirley Thomas (VCU) for sharing their expertise on this effort. Attached for your review is the proposed new Kudzu policy/process document. You’ll see the proposed additions/deletions/changes highlighted – hope this is not too hard to decipher. Please review / comment and/or offer your support for these changes by
March 1, 2015 by sending a note to
kudzu-ops [at] aserl-lists.org so the Kudzu-Ops group can be aware of the status. Thanks very kindly. --jeb John Burger, Executive Director Association of Southeastern Research Libraries ASERL c/o Georgia State University Library - Administration Suite LS7 100 Decatur Street SE Atlanta, GA 30303-3202 Follow ASERL on Facebook:
http://on.fb.me/Ziuz2a
Find me on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/ASERLJEB
|
- Re: FW: PLEASE REVIEW: Draft changes to Kudzu Policies/Processes, (continued)
- Re: FW: PLEASE REVIEW: Draft changes to Kudzu Policies/Processes Shirley R Thomas, March 2 2015
- Re: FW: PLEASE REVIEW: Draft changes to Kudzu Policies/Processes Harper, James, March 2 2015
- Re: FW: PLEASE REVIEW: Draft changes to Kudzu Policies/Processes Deborah Slingluff, March 2 2015
- Re: FW: PLEASE REVIEW: Draft changes to Kudzu Policies/Processes Toplon, James E, March 2 2015
- Re: FW: PLEASE REVIEW: Draft changes to Kudzu Policies/Processes John Burger, March 3 2015
- Re: FW: PLEASE REVIEW: Draft changes to Kudzu Policies/Processes Deborah Slingluff, March 3 2015
- Re: FW: PLEASE REVIEW: Draft changes to Kudzu Policies/Processes Gail P Barton (gpbarton), March 3 2015
- Re: FW: PLEASE REVIEW: Draft changes to Kudzu Policies/Processes Bailey, Kathleen Thornton, March 3 2015
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.