Hi Chris,
We currently have a three-year license to Scite, and we are investigating Consensus. The license for Scite has been negotiated and paid for by the library. It will be the same for Consensus if we move forward with them. Thanks.
Ben Rawlins
Associate Dean for Outreach, Engagement and Collections
University of Kentucky Libraries
brawl2 [at] uky.edu
Pronouns: he/him/his
From:
aserl-collection-strategy <aserl-collection-strategy-bounces+ben.rawlins=uky.edu [at] aserl-lists.org> on behalf of Morales, Laura <lcmorales [at] wm.edu>
Date: Thursday, November 13, 2025 at 11:01 AM
To: Rawlins, Benjamin S. <ben.rawlins [at] uky.edu>
Cc: Email list for Collection Strategists & Managers working in ASERL libraries <aserl-collection-strategy [at] aserl-lists.org>, etzoc [at] clemson.edu <etzoc [at] clemson.edu>, lewisjd [at] wfu.edu <lewisjd [at] wfu.edu>, Way, Douglas E. <doug.way [at] uky.edu>
Subject: Re: [aserl-collection-strategy] Scite.ai, Consensus, and Other Tools
William & Mary has a subscription to Scite. It was negotiated and paid for by the library. I think we've had it for two or three years now (we were an early adopter). VIVA is currently doing a
VA-wide trial of both Scite and Consensus that just started yesterday.
Laura C. Morales
Associate Dean of Collections & Content Services
William & Mary Libraries
lcmorales [at] wm.edu
*I don’t expect you to respond to my email outside your work hours. Feel free to read, act on or respond at a time that works for you.*
William & Mary acknowledges the Indigenous peoples who are the original inhabitants of the lands our campus is on today – the Cheroenhaka (Nottoway), Chickahominy, Eastern Chickahominy, Mattaponi, Monacan, Nansemond, Nottoway,
Pamunkey, Patawomeck, Upper Mattaponi, and Rappahannock tribes – and pay our respect to their tribal members past and present.
From: aserl-collection-strategy <aserl-collection-strategy-bounces+lcmorales=wm.edu [at] aserl-lists.org>
on behalf of John Burger, ASERL <jburger [at] aserl.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2025 10:53 AM
To: Morales, Laura <lcmorales [at] wm.edu>
Cc: Email list for Collection Strategists & Managers working in ASERL libraries <aserl-collection-strategy [at] aserl-lists.org>; etzoc [at] clemson.edu <etzoc [at] clemson.edu>; lewisjd [at] wfu.edu <lewisjd [at] wfu.edu>; Way, Douglas E. <doug.way [at] uky.edu>
Subject: Re: [aserl-collection-strategy] Scite.ai, Consensus, and Other Tools
Hi Chris –
I don’t know about Consensus – never heard of that one – but at least a few ASERL members are using scite.ai – including Clemson, Wake Forest, and (I think) U-Kentucky. I am
copying the contacts at each library so they can confirm / discuss their experiences / connect you to the right people. There may be others as well – those are the ones I know about.
ALSO/ FYI: ASERL has a standing discount offer for scite – see
https://www.aserl.org/member-area/ -- that may be helpful in your deliberations.
I hope this helps.
Kind regards,
--j.e.b.
John Burger, Executive Director
Association of Southeastern Research Libraries (ASERL)
c/o Robert W. Woodruff Library / Emory University
540 Asbury Circle, #316
Atlanta, Georgia 30322
From: aserl-collection-strategy <aserl-collection-strategy-bounces+jburger=aserl.org [at] aserl-lists.org>
On Behalf Of Palazzolo, Christopher
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2025 10:48 AM
To: John Burger, ASERL <jburger [at] aserl.org>
Cc: Email list for Collection Strategists & Managers working in ASERL libraries <aserl-collection-strategy [at] aserl-lists.org>
Subject: [aserl-collection-strategy] Scite.ai, Consensus, and Other Tools
Please pardon duplication!
Here at Emory Libraries, we are starting and expediting a process to establish a policy re: AI product promotion and/or acquisition. As I am sure many of you have experienced,
vendors are offering quite a few options (most for additional purchase) for such products. Two vendors in particular have been relatively persistent—Scite.ai and Consensus. Note that Emory has not yet signed on to a university-wide academic AI tool such as
ChatGPT or Microsoft Copilot Academic, but is currently exploring such alternatives. Supposedly, a new AI policy is to be unveiled in December. In any case, I am curious if anyone on these lists has a site license to either Scite.ai and/or Consensus and if
so, who is paying, who negotiated the license, etc.
Thanks for any and all information you’re able to share!
Chris Palazzolo, PhD
Director of Collections and Open Strategies
Woodruff Library
Librarian for Economics, Political Science, and French and Italian
Emory University
540 Asbury Circle NE
Atlanta, GA 30322
cpalazz [at] emory.edu
404-727-0143
|